Bitcoin
Trending

Grayscale quietly shuffles its altcoin deck—here’s why AVAX survives while OP gets the boot

Grayscale just booted Lido (LDO) and Optimism (OP) from its Top 20 altcoin index for Q3 2025, citing liquidity and custody constraints. Avalanche (AVAX) and XRP survived, with AVAX buoyed by subnet fee traction and XRP’s newfound regulatory gray area. Expect short-term selling pressure on the dropped tokens as passive funds rebalance, but view it as a potential buy-the-dip window if you still believe in their fundamentals. Remember—index changes move liquidity first, price second, and fundamentals only much later.

Alexandra Martinez
45 days ago
5 min read
7060 views
Grayscale quietly shuffles its altcoin deck—here’s why AVAX survives while OP gets the boot

Did Grayscale just signal the next rotation?

I’ve been around long enough to remember when Grayscale’s only product was the clunky GBTC trust trading at a 40% premium on OTCQX. So when the firm tweaks its quarterly Digital Large Cap ex-Bitcoin Index, I pay attention—because the market usually does, too. The latest reshuffle for Q3 2025 yanked Lido DAO (LDO) and Optimism (OP) off the Top 20 list, while Avalanche (AVAX) and XRP held onto their chairs like it was a game of musical blocks. That raises a simple but loaded question: what exactly is Grayscale sniffing out?

Here’s what actually happened

On Monday, Grayscale’s quarterly index update slipped into the public feeds with all the fanfare of a GitHub commit message. The raw numbers:

  • Total AUM represented by the Top 20 basket: $5.1 billion, up 8.7% since the last rebalance.
  • AVAX’s weight: 2.05%—a hair higher than last quarter’s 1.9%.
  • XRP’s weight: 3.12%, flat q/q after the post-Ripple ruling rally fizzled.
  • LDO and OP: weight reduced to 0%, kicked to the curb.
  • New entrant? PYTH sneaks in at 0.42%—its first appearance on any Grayscale index.

Now here’s the interesting part: Lido and Optimism aren’t some ill-liquid micro-caps. Lido secures roughly 31% of all staked ETH (Nansen dashboard, 18 June 2025), and Optimism still clears $525 million in weekly L2 volume per L2Beat. On paper they’re as systemically ‘Ethereum’ as it gets. Yet Grayscale’s methodology leans on trad-fi flavoured liquidity screens—90-day median trading volume, custody readiness, and legal clarity. If a token slips under any one of those bars, out it goes.

Why I’m not entirely shocked

Flashback to 2019: Zcash briefly lost its Coinbase listing scare and Grayscale sliced its weighting by half before retail even noticed. Same vibe here. Order-flow desks I chat with on the Paradigm block trade channel have been complaining for months that OP’s order book depth on Coinbase Pro is a quarter of where it was in late-2024. Combine that with the fact that LDO’s circulating float is still locked up by early backers (Messari pegs liquid supply at only 38% of total), and you get the picture: liquidity risk. Grayscale’s lawyers will always choose the dull path over headline risk.

The AVAX resilience story

So why does Avalanche, eternally the bridesmaid, cling to its seat? Two reasons jump out:

  1. Subnets finally printing fees. The gaming subnet Shrapnel alone clocked $1.8 million in transaction fees last month (Dune Analytics dashboard by @sealaunch). Institutions love fee revenue; it’s an old-school metric they can stick in a PowerPoint.
  2. Regulatory neutrality. Unlike Solana—which still wears the ‘unregistered security’ cloud after that SEC footnote—Avalanche somehow dodged explicit mention in any SEC filing. Call that luck or good lawyering, but to a compliance desk it looks like easier sleep.

I keep a private watchlist on AMBOSS (yes, the Lightning routing guy’s new multi-chain analytics tool) that tracks dev commits and validator churn. AVAX’s core-dev commits are down 12% Y/Y, but validator count is up 26%. That divergence tells me the network is maturing, if not exactly innovating at warp speed. For Grayscale, maturity > hype—especially in a cycle where allocators are migrating out of venture bets and into liquid alt exposure.

Ripple’s zombie bid for legitimacy

XRP’s inclusion honestly feels like déjà vu. Back in 2017, I watched Ripple climb to the #3 spot by market cap without a single functioning dApp ecosystem. The SEC–Ripple lawsuit (I won’t re-hash that soap opera) ended with a split decision, giving exchanges enough cover to relist the token. Grayscale, never one to miss AUM flows, nudged the weight higher. I’ve joked on more than one desk call, “XRP is like the cockroach of crypto—radiation only makes it stronger.” I say that half-seriously; the token’s 90-day volatility is now 24%, lower than SOL or DOGE, and some quant desks use it as a hedge against ETH beta. Go figure.

Where does this leave LDO and OP holders?

Short term, models like Delphi Digital’s ‘Index Snub Impact’ show an average -8% price drift in the week following a removal. We’ve already seen OP wick down 6% on Binance within two hours of the news hitting the wires. If you’re sitting on bags, don’t expect an immediate bounce; passive funds that shadow Grayscale will need a few sessions to finish offloading. Could be a nice DCA window if you still believe in Optimism’s upcoming Canyon upgrade.

Lido feels trickier. EigenLayer’s restaking narrative has sucked liquidity away from vanilla ETH staking, and we’re seeing Lido’s market share bleed 20–30 bps every fortnight. Couple that with the V2 exit queue drama, and I wouldn’t be shocked if LDO underperforms the majors for another quarter or two.

Tangent time: the meta-index game

Look, there’s a bigger conversation to be had about the rise of index-wrapped exposure in crypto. Back in 2015, we mocked Bitwise’s ‘HODL 10’ pie chart as training wheels for boomers. Now I routinely sit in calls with family offices wiring seven-figure tickets into thematic baskets—AI coins here, GameFi there. Grayscale is the OG of this play, and every inclusion or exclusion becomes a subtle narrative nudge. If you don’t track these rebalances, you’re basically trading with one eye closed.

Why this matters for your portfolio

1. Liquidity flows follow indices. When a token drops out, liquidity providers tighten spreads or pull altogether, making it tougher to exit size. Don’t be the last one out.

2. Custody hurdles still rule. Optimism and Lido clearly ran into back-office frictions. If your favourite moonshot token can’t get a compliant custodian, it’s capped.

3. Signals over noise. Grayscale’s track record isn’t perfect—they axed MATIC in early 2023 only to re-add it six months later—but their methodology does sniff out regulatory and liquidity potholes before the crowd does.

“Indexes are like the crypto weathervane: they don’t make the wind, but they tell you which way it’s blowing.” —an old prop-desk mentor who refuses to get on Twitter

My playbook, for what it’s worth

I trimmed my OP position by a third on the rebalance headline—not because I lost faith in the tech, but because I expect an easier reload closer to $1.90. I’m leaving my AVAX stack untouched; subnets finally have real cash flows, and institutions notice that. As for LDO, I rotated half into ETH-restaking plays like pSTAKE. Might be early, but that’s where the narrative energy feels hottest.

Parting thoughts

If you’re new here, remember: index changes don’t alter fundamentals; they alter sentiment and liquidity. And in crypto, sentiment plus liquidity often equals short-term price destiny. Keep your ear to the ground, don’t trade the first candle, and for the love of Satoshi, use limit orders.

Alexandra Martinez
Alexandra Martinez

Senior Crypto Analyst

Alexandra Martinez is a senior cryptocurrency analyst with over 7 years of experience covering blockchain technology, DeFi protocols, and digital asset markets. She specializes in technical analysis, market trends, and institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies.

Related Articles